Theodur, on Oct 25 2005, 04:35 AM, said:
SimDing0, on Oct 24 2005, 11:51 PM, said:
But that doesn't seem to be anything to do with what I asked.
Let me put it this way: I am not arrogant enough to declare Tolkien's writing to be of bad quality just because I don't particularly enjoy reading LotR.
Really? Why is that, I wonder?
Quote
Your defence of BG2's comedy moments was "it's popular". And so, I'm still asking, do you think that serves as an adequate defence of writing quality?
If your argument against it is 'Sim doesn't like it', then yes, it's more than adequate.
Quote
You really think it's that arrogant to suggest that "Run, my furry brothers! RUN!!" isn't neccessarily a great part of literary history?
So you consider the other parts of the game to be a great part of literary history, then?
Edited by Theodur, 24 October 2005 - 11:33 PM.