What should really also be in a refinements mod
#1
Posted 26 March 2004 - 09:29 PM
Granted, I play a good party most of the time, but it is really not possible to RP an evil character. I find myself constantly justifying making the good choice just to complete quests with my EEEEvil char.
I feel the same way about certain dialogs that make it impossible to RP certain characters. Take Paladins for example. Would a Paladin really complete the Mae'var quest? Absolutely not. There is no way a Paladin would work for a theives' guild. And the thought of one fundametally becoming a vigilante and killing Mae'var is ludicrous. They would have brought them to justice. Would they work for Bodhi instead? A Paladin would tolerate Yoshimo rather nicely, but never would have escorted him to the guildhall for employment opportunities.
Even having to lie to advance, such as the guardian golem in Irenicus' dungeon. You have to lie and tell him you are Irenicus. That grates on me every time I play a paladin.
As a DM, I would make a Paladin fallen for so much stuff they have to do in this game just to advance the plot.
As for Evil character, there is no way to RP one through the game. Well, maybe, ending up about level 12 at the tree of life from not completing any quests. Most of the quests are pleas for help, offering no promise of reward up front. I mean, come on...About the most evil thing you can do is complete the Mae'var quest, then turn around and work for Bodhi.
#2
Posted 27 March 2004 - 12:40 AM
(Plus, Littiz and T.G.M. don't really need any other work for quite some time)
PnP Celestials
Geomantic Sorcerer Kit
#3
Posted 27 March 2004 - 02:26 AM
Besides, you'd better ask TGM, I never play evil parties
For this aspect you will want to keep an eye on Return to Windspear, BTW (and wait patiently ).
Ever forward, my darling wind...
#4
Posted 27 March 2004 - 03:59 AM
Me either. The very idea of playing evil disturbs me. I seen plenty of posts where folks seem to feel otherwise ... but every time I see stuff like 'there is no such thing as "evil" just personal bias' I disagree so strongly I get a bit nauseous. For that reason I avoid the debates. It would get too personal too quickly.If something in this direction is going to happen, it's not definitely going to happen soon.
Besides, you'd better ask TGM, I never play evil parties
#5
Posted 27 March 2004 - 06:55 AM
I'm your man then...The very idea of playing evil disturbs me. I seen plenty of posts where folks seem to feel otherwise
I think I never even tried a good party, only a true neautral - once.
Refinements v2 has been released!
Go and visit the website or the forum for more info!
Member of The Silver Star team.
#6
Posted 27 March 2004 - 09:48 AM
Free your mind
#7
Posted 27 March 2004 - 10:20 AM
But that said, i'd prolly never play a paladin, atleast seriously. I prefer a LN monk...or a CG dense fighter, or a wild mage...
#8
Posted 27 March 2004 - 02:37 PM
Seriously though, I lovce paladins, and have probably played one a third of my time. It makes me cringe every time I HAVE to do something that a paladin would never do.
On the evil note, I tried a party with a PC fighter dualled to assassin, Bodhi, Korgan, Edwin, Viconia, and it sort of sucked. I tried really RP'ing my PC (Neutral Evil), and I did not get probably half the quests.
I suppose you are all correct. Balancing the alignments for quests will probably never happen, which is too bad.
#9 -JTrebeil-
Posted 27 March 2004 - 02:59 PM
#10
Posted 28 March 2004 - 05:54 AM
btw, any other game with d&d wont be evil, too. thanks to wotc and their opinion that good must prevail in the end.
#11
Posted 28 March 2004 - 09:48 AM