Most 'Redeemable' BG - SoA - ToB villain
#161
Posted 25 March 2004 - 04:02 PM
sorry, I got carried away.
Free your mind
#162
Posted 25 March 2004 - 06:49 PM
This might be valid, but it is moderately to completely hopeless. Bioware did not seem to care very much for FR lore. For example, they misplaced Bhaal's home plane. Just take it as if Jon was special to the point of being outside the normal sequence of events. Also, IIRC they gave him a soul (but a human one -- read his journal in Spellhold; he complains about how his elven essense was replaced with that of a human or somesuch).1) Jon Irenicus would not end up in the Abyss after his death. He would merely cease to be. He has no soul, and no divine spark... The former was reclaimed by CHARNAME, the latter had been stripped by the Seldarine.
2) Bioware seem to either not understand how FR's afterlife works, or they like the idea of certain individuals having "special fates" with regards to that. Even if Jon had a soul, he would not have ended up in the Abyss... Unless he was faithful to some CE deity. (Or he accepted the offer of a Tanar'ri while his soul was queued up on the Fugue Plane awaiting Kelemvor's judgement.)
#163
Posted 25 March 2004 - 07:09 PM
http://www.moveon.org/fox/
"You are what you do. Choose again, and change."
--Cordelia Naismith Vorkosigan
#164
Posted 25 March 2004 - 07:32 PM
I have drained you, drained you of the very thing that made you special. It is the worst of curses, and I should know. - why is it the worst if he got something in exchange for what was taken?
No, you warrant no villain's exposition from me. You are barely sentient now. I have taken your very divinity, and drained you of your soul.
Bodhi! Remove this nothing... and Imoen as well. We are restored at their expense and need them no longer. Our revenge to come is now all the sweeter.
Have your victory here then, but know that you are dying on the inside even now! Many will join you before I am done! My home will feel my wrath!
and finally:
The curse that was wrought against Bodhi and I has now ceased and yours has begun. You will wither, you will wane, and you will die.
Wonder - why he is so vehement if the curse was 'nothing' but removal of immortality?
And finally here is the quote from the infamous journal:
My condition grows worse, and what I remember of my 'home' is fleeting. I see images of family whose names I cannot recall, and dream of emotions I no longer feel as vividly. On occasion I sense nature as if she is my mother, as though never removed from her bosom, but such moments are few. I bear the hallmarks of senility with the rage and power of a young elf to lament it.
I say it hardly sounds as if he was given human soul in exchange for amputated elven spirit. In fact it sounds as if he was left with nothing. But it is a matter of personal interpretation. I just want to point out that it is ver very likely that he indeed had lost ability to feel anything but anger.
I would pity my 'sister' if I was capable, but emotions come to me only in violent outbursts. Ellesime has taken my ability to truly feel, and I am left with the threadbare heart of a human, or some other short-lived vermin. I will not suffer this much longer.
Freedom cannot be equated with goodness, virtue, or perfection. Freedom has its own unique self-contained nature; freedom is freedom ? not universal goodness. Any confusion or deliberate equalization of freedom with goodness and excellence is in itself negation of freedom, and acceptance of the path of restraint and enforcement.
Nikolai Berdyaev - Christian Existentialist, Philosopher of Freedom.
The Longer Road mod
Redemption mod
Bitter Grey Ashes
#165
Posted 25 March 2004 - 08:33 PM
Yes, I agree that Jon is simply showing some elven prejudice here, and equalling being human with being soulless. Though the alternative does create some fascinating imagery. (Imagines Suldanesselar elves headed by Ellesime ripping out human souls to graft onto Jon and Bodhi.)No, he says that he no longer has his elven essence, and cannot feel because he has "the threadbare heart of a human or some such short-lived vermin." Since humans can feel, this is obviously Jon being silly.
#166
Posted 25 March 2004 - 09:38 PM
#167 -BobTokyo-
Posted 26 March 2004 - 03:01 AM
It was given to a vampire, who then reformed, assisted a vampire slayer, fought evil, and eventuall started work at an interdimensional law firm between bouts of brooding and sophmoric whinging about redemption.So then where did his soul go? Obviously it isn't in him, but from what i understand of FR lore it cannot be destroyed like that.
#168
Posted 26 March 2004 - 05:43 AM
Freedom cannot be equated with goodness, virtue, or perfection. Freedom has its own unique self-contained nature; freedom is freedom ? not universal goodness. Any confusion or deliberate equalization of freedom with goodness and excellence is in itself negation of freedom, and acceptance of the path of restraint and enforcement.
Nikolai Berdyaev - Christian Existentialist, Philosopher of Freedom.
The Longer Road mod
Redemption mod
Bitter Grey Ashes
#169 -Ashara-
Posted 26 March 2004 - 06:34 AM
The said passage describes memory loss, rather than intrinsic inability to experience emotions - iirc elves enter the state of reverie to be able to vividly remember the events of their long-long lives.
#170
Posted 26 March 2004 - 07:52 AM
The said passage describes memory loss, rather than intrinsic inability to experience emotions
You know it sounds inconvincing, and I know it too. Especially since you deliberately ignored the other one...
I would pity my 'sister' if I was capable, but emotions come to me only in violent outbursts. Ellesime has taken my ability to truly feel
But I assume this can be explain by some more verbal equilibristic. If you don't want to believe in certain concept that is too horrible to comprehend - you will ignore the facts. Same is true about me of course - once I formed an opinion I will stick to it.
I can only say that it took me some time to try come up with a concept of what Bio really wanted to convey in SoA plot, and explain all their strange (to say the least) plot twists and various replicas by different personages. I had a few email exchanges with DG - and whilst he did not officially 'endorse' my plot, he did not complain about it, but said that it was a 'very good' one. I am not insisting that my explanation is the only 'true' - but it fits well with the majority of the game facts and if you remember the other Bio games - their plots are alwyas elaborate and hover in 'grey area'. Ie - there is no clearly defined 'evil' or 'good' sides. Just remember the FallFromGrace who is a neutral-good succubus - from your Pov she is an abomination.
Freedom cannot be equated with goodness, virtue, or perfection. Freedom has its own unique self-contained nature; freedom is freedom ? not universal goodness. Any confusion or deliberate equalization of freedom with goodness and excellence is in itself negation of freedom, and acceptance of the path of restraint and enforcement.
Nikolai Berdyaev - Christian Existentialist, Philosopher of Freedom.
The Longer Road mod
Redemption mod
Bitter Grey Ashes
#171 -Guest-
Posted 26 March 2004 - 08:09 AM
*Shrugs* Why do you always have to make any abstract discussion personal and make statements about how other people should feel about certain things, which are not being dicussed?
F.ex: The only other BioWARE game I played was IWD, and I did not like PST - and no, not because of gray areas, but because the initial dialogues with flying scull were overly idiotic and I got quickly desinterested in playing with a male PC, so I have no opinion whatsoever on the succubus.
#172
Posted 26 March 2004 - 08:59 AM
Well, he says himself that emotions come to him, moreover come in "violent outbursts", ie the way humans feel.
Humans do not feel in violent outbursts - according to him in his other statement, humans have no feelings.
And once again I ask thee -
What is soul for in your opinion - if not for feeling love and compassion? Ie - if removal of soul does not remove ability to feel empathy (as you insist) what does it do, if anything?
If you dont have immortality - your soul can be taken with no ill effects?
And what does 'dead inside' mean? Please explain.
I would pity my 'sister' if I was capable
Which implies he 'cannot' feel pity. Which is exactly my point - he can only feel anger and other basic agressive emotions, not love or pity or anything related to compassion.
*Shrugs* Why do you always have to make any abstract discussion personal and make statements about how other people should feel about certain things, which are not being dicussed?
Cause I did not want to say 'your logic is lame'
As for the flying skull - I find his dialogs hilarious, the Bio at its best - once again we differ in our tastes.
Freedom cannot be equated with goodness, virtue, or perfection. Freedom has its own unique self-contained nature; freedom is freedom ? not universal goodness. Any confusion or deliberate equalization of freedom with goodness and excellence is in itself negation of freedom, and acceptance of the path of restraint and enforcement.
Nikolai Berdyaev - Christian Existentialist, Philosopher of Freedom.
The Longer Road mod
Redemption mod
Bitter Grey Ashes
#173
Posted 26 March 2004 - 09:29 AM
#174 -Ashara-
Posted 26 March 2004 - 10:11 AM
Humans do not feel in violent outbursts - according to him in his other statement, humans have no feelings.quotes
Or, he does not recogmize them in their human garden-variety. That's why they seem "violent" and "sudden" to him, since he cannot reverie and cultivate them and connect them for the past hundred years....
What is soul for in your opinion - if not for feeling love and compassion? Ie - if removal of soul does not remove ability to feel empathy (as you insist) what does it do, if anything?
If you dont have immortality - your soul can be taken with no ill effects?
And I again ask thee - where dost thou seen the proof that his soul was stolen, if the game states clearly that it was his connection to elven spirit that was severed? Ability to feel empathy comes from ability to think, as well as from the ability to feel. You seem to place a huge emphasis on the one side of the triangle - feelings, but a person's mind is just as capable of seeing the necessity to do good. So even if his feelings are somewhat foreign to him, he is fully capable of figuring out that when he sticks the pointy end of his knife he causes pain.
And what does 'dead inside' mean? Please explain.
Now, that's a very common expression, to be honest, used by people who f.ex loved strongly and then stopped. Or something else drammatic happened. I assume that severing from Elven spirit and loss of the connection to other elves qualifies.
Which implies he 'cannot' feel pity. Which is exactly my point - he can only feel anger and other basic agressive emotions, not love or pity or anything related to compassion.
Does he acess his *emotions* correct? It can easily be that he had been embittered, not lost his ability to pity absolutely. It happens to people who have hit a rough stretch. Many pitiless people abide in this world, who for all we know have a perfectly intact soul. And there are people who trust that they have no souls in the material sense, but can pity sucessfully. Besides, the paragraph refers to Bodhi, who turned into a vampire. It is difficult to feel pity for her for someone as vengeful and as intimately involved with her as Irenicus.
Cause I did not want to say 'your logic is lame'
I prefer open insult to unfounded insinuations and hints on some sort of moral handicap.
As for the flying skull - I find his dialogs hilarious, the Bio at its best - once again we differ in our tastes.
Too modern, breaching the immersion and blantly silly.
#175
Posted 26 March 2004 - 10:26 AM
I.e. the way humans feel? Wtf?Well, he says himself that emotions come to him, moreover come in "violent outbursts", ie the way humans feel.
*is human and does feel without violent outbursts. Occasionally*
http://www.moveon.org/fox/
"You are what you do. Choose again, and change."
--Cordelia Naismith Vorkosigan
#176 -Guest-
Posted 26 March 2004 - 10:31 AM
Soul Status: Irenicus has perfectly functional elven soul
Actions: Irenicus conspires to ascend to godhood to destroy his native city's sacred relic and betrays his lover.
Soul Status: Irenicus has malfunctioning soul (human's) or have no soul at all if you wish
Actions: Irenicus conspires to ascend to godhood and makes torture chambers, enjoying a series of body-mind separation experiments
Soul Status: Irenicus possesses a functional soul of a <insert race> proven capable of love/mercy etc.
Actions: Irenicus conspires to ascend to godhood, consorts with drow and destroys Suldanessellar.
So, no matter if he has a soul or not in any given time, his actions are driven by the same abstract idea borne in his mind.
#177 -Guest-
Posted 26 March 2004 - 10:35 AM
*is human and does feel without violent outbursts. Occasionally*
It was repeated time and again in the fantasy literature that elves feel differently, more intensly. Thus, it is not inconcievable, that a human emotion will "taste" blunt to an elf, should he be subjected to feeling them, unless it is really strong, and then it is bound to "feel" like an outburst. "violent" not in the meaning that you only feel a need for cutting someone's throat, but in the meaning of "strong", "heart-wrenching", "hitting you hard on the head"
#178
Posted 26 March 2004 - 10:45 AM
http://www.moveon.org/fox/
"You are what you do. Choose again, and change."
--Cordelia Naismith Vorkosigan
#179
Posted 26 March 2004 - 10:52 AM
The case for soul and related feelings notwithstanding I think that it maybe right to assume that this is the point (quoted above) which marks the last use of 'feelings' on this matter. You feel the need for something, burning desire dictates your plans and then, even if that first impetus is lost, it depends your perseverance to pursue that plan even after losing the motives out of sight. Think of it as something like a clan feud that went on for generations. You cannot remember why, you just hate them. Not so much as a strong feeling but as a construct of reality in your head. Jon had feelings at a point. Everything else is IMHO irrelevant to him. He had a plan before and his intellect (alone) dictates his actions now.Plus, the game has shown full independence of Irenicus actions from his soul-bearing:
Soul Status: Irenicus has perfectly functional elven soul
Actions: Irenicus conspires to ascend to godhood to destroy his native city's sacred relic and betrays his lover.
....
Free your mind
#180
Posted 26 March 2004 - 11:08 AM
Please prove that the statements below does not indicate that his soul is no more, and that does not need a replacement.
I have drained you, drained you of the very thing that made you special. It is the worst of curses, and I should know.
No, you warrant no villain's exposition from me. You are barely sentient now. I have taken your very divinity, and drained you of your soul.
The curse that was wrought against Bodhi and I has now ceased and yours has begun. You will wither, you will wane, and you will die.
'He is dead inside' is a statement by one of the dryads who tells us that their charms have no effect - because there is nothing there they can affect - ie no soul.
What is his curse is not the ability to feel removed together with connetion with the Spirit?
I know that not believing it makes everything much simpler - everything is black and white - on one side villains on the other heroes and wonderful golden-tressed heroines with hearts of gold. Shrug. But this does not make all the basic facts of the plot go away - and Irenicus has no soul and you know it.
Freedom cannot be equated with goodness, virtue, or perfection. Freedom has its own unique self-contained nature; freedom is freedom ? not universal goodness. Any confusion or deliberate equalization of freedom with goodness and excellence is in itself negation of freedom, and acceptance of the path of restraint and enforcement.
Nikolai Berdyaev - Christian Existentialist, Philosopher of Freedom.
The Longer Road mod
Redemption mod
Bitter Grey Ashes