8 replies to this topic

[Lucythebeast]

Check it out here.

[Warder]

Nice! I'm glad to see things are still happening, despite the loss of the coders.

[Shed]

Does anyone have a saved copy of the website ?

[Vita Muerte]

As a matter of fact, I do.
http://chloe.fwstudios.net/

Edit: Not that it made a difference. Apparently this link is not valid anymore.

Edited by Vita Muerte, 06 July 2005 - 09:20 AM.

[jcompton]

http://web.archive.o....fwstudios.net/ appears at a glance to have all of the content. This is one of the downsides to the global find-and-replace SC did on the forum database. For many if not most of the links, it's valid, but ones like this will fail until and unless SC decides to implement mod name subdomains.

(And, yeah, I just love that fwstudios.net portal page. So much for the redirect.)

[Shed]

  It just dawned on me that you probably meant the content and not the url itself. That's what I get for multitasking. I guess I'll go back to work now. 

That's right , I wanted the whole webpage.

http://web.archive.o....fwstudios.net/ appears at a glance to have all of the content.

Thanks.

[Lucythebeast]

I still have all the webcontent saved on my computer. If I'm given the new ftp address to upload the stuff to, the website will be back.

[Lucythebeast]

Chloe's website is back up. I didn't really make any changes to it... other than changing the FAQ question to say Spellhold Studios for the forum instead of the old host... and of course I changed the Forum link to this site instead of the old host. And I removed a bunch of old outdated and unwanted links (all the band links, removed my journal link because my new journal is friends-only, and removed the link to my band's webpage since I took it down and never felt like or had the time to make a new one.)

But, it's back up. Probably the most use it will get is those new to the mod or don't remember or haven't seen the website... or those wanting to try one of the alternate Chloe portraits. I didn't add any, though it would be a simple matter to do so in the future. I guess. heh The link up at the top of this thread is valid.