You mean according to the contents of an unofficial mod she's bisexual?
Let's see: Weimer's Solaufein is bisexual, Imoen and Viconia are both bisexual in Lord Mirrabo's Imoen romance mod, and now Nalia's bisexual thanks to yet another author's personal interpretation of her character. Is there a character in Baldur's Gate 2 who isn't gay/bisexual?
Well, yeah, and as I said, I think it might be a good idea to avoid conflicts with other Mods. If possible conflicts with Chloe don't bother LeFay, then she is welcome to ignore that information and write her own interpretation.
As for characters that are not, off the top of my head, Anomen, Keldorn, Aerie, Jan, Edwin, Mazzy, Sarevok, and Jaheira are portrayed as having significant heterosexual relationships or orientations. It might be possible to finesse around Cernd's abandonment of his wife but that's not something I would explore.
I'm wondering what the heck is the point of complaining at length about gay themed mods that include the interpretation that some of the more ambiguous NPCs may not be heterosexual? How is Lucy's interpretation more outrageous than the heterosexual romance mod?
An anti-homosexual religious stance, for example, isn't necessarily homophobic. It can simply stem from a belief or set of beliefs. Branding anyone whom disagrees with homosexuality as homophobic is unfair IMO.
I agree. Which is why I've always prefered the term "heterosexsm" because it more accurately describes a form of prejudice and bias analogous to "racism" and "sexism." But by all means, I will fully admit a bias against
the opinion that homosexuality is not worthy of full support. I'll fight people's right to express their opinion, but I don't feel I have to pretend that I agree with it, or pretend that it is an ideology that, when acted on, harms myself and people I care about. Being open-minded, does not mean that we walk into discussions with an empty head willing to accept any opinion as valid.
I also have a knee-jerk reaction with the term "natural" but the basic problem that just about every political and philosophical argument that invokes "natural" is both full of shit (on both sides), and at least 50 years behind the study of genetics and behavior is perhaps a topic for another time. (Here is a hint, for most of the last 50 years biologists have been talking about nature/nurture not it terms of "which" but "how much of each.") But it would be nice if this discussion got back to providing productive feedback for how to develop this mod.