When, in any of my posts, did I say I was right and you are wrong? When, in any of my posts, did I say that mine was the only opinion?
- ?I'm disputing Imoen being hetero 'just because every one else is' or because it's the "norm". It's a short-sighted arguement, and not one based on
FR standards, but on real-life standards. Do you understand that??
- ?I think you underestimate.. you know what, I'm not even going to bother.?
- ?And you'll never understand it unless you really want to.?
- ??and then some ..person comes in talking about percentages or some other, equally ridiculous disclaimer.?
- ?Can you hear me now? I'm done talking; believe what you want.?
- ?And it's not like assuming she smokes - what the hell kind of analogy is that? (See? That was rude).?
- ?Not good enough, and you (should) know it.?
Sorry if I misinterpreted comments like these to indicate you consider your opinion to be the only correct one.
No one in the game demonstrates homosexuality. That would include the same coutesan who claims that there's someone but, well, s/he's not here right now. Or am I supposed to be content with that? The courtesan does not, herself, display these tendancies; my statement still stands.
I think we may be using the term
NPC differently, which is causing the problem here. When I say "there are
NPC's in the game..." I'm not thinking solely of the people with circles around their feet. Maybe I should say "there are people..." rather than "there are
NPC's...". Would you agree with my statement then?
So now that we've reached the point where it seems you've got nothing left, because you're now analyzing me, this is all I'm saying on the matter
I didn't mean to offend you with my comment - it was just an aside when you wondered why people were all the sudden asking you for proof - most of your posts come across as "your opinion's wrong", to which a request for proof is valid (actually most people were just asking for evidence, which is different from asking for a proof).
But maybe you're right about us just repeating our points. Let's try a different tactic. Here's a list of the *evidence* (not proof) people have given one way or the other, with the most obvious way of refuting it listed as well...
Imoen is Hetero because...
...she doesn?t say one way or the other, & the default is Hetero (doesn?t take into account her personality).
...Bioware didn?t portray her as anything other than straight (they didn?t have the option).
...the books indicate they could have if they wanted to (they have a Family Friendly policy despite the books).
...she flirts with Haer Dalis? (she rejects him; even if she weren?t straight she?d appreciate the compliment).
...she flirts with Keldorn (she could still be Bi).
Imoen is not Hetero because...
...she has characteristics of a Bi person (she has characteristics of a non-Bhaalspawn but that assumption would be false).
...when restoring Sarevok, you get the ?unrequited?? & ?I?d do anything for CHARNAME? speeches regardless of gender (could indicate sibling love not romantic love).
...she says the Dryads are beautiful (straight females can compliment other females; Dryads are beautiful to everyone).
...she?s a lesbian in the books (the books are crap).
Maybe this'll be more productive. Feel free to add to either list anything I've left off.
- Imrahil