B) I can see it all now B)Incest is rarely mentioned in D&D at all. Few are the campaigns that even bear mention to it in the manual, let alone anything else.
Presenting the new "Throne of Damnation" campaign for 3rd Edition Dungeons & Dragons from Wizards Of The Coast TM.
Including:
New Areas To Explore;
New Enemies To Combat;
New Interractions To Conduct; AND
New "Moral Concerns" To Deal With, With The Introduction Of:
The New "Incest Quests" Featuring:
-Moral Problems & Cases
-Hard To Deal With NPCs Either For Or Against Incest
-And A Step By Step Guide To Bringing "Incest To The Realms"
I mean how strange/insane would that be? Truth is Incest is such a akward subject that to incorporate into a "world" so directly could spell doom for the developers, with them being judged by consumers.
So intead they choose to acknowledge it existence, without drawing attention to it.
For example, they would talk about inbreeding throughout noble families or in tribes, villages and stuff, but never would they refer to it as Incest.
As a distributer of media and such, I know how hard it is to present something that the majority of consumers may not like, while at the same time trying to hide it true origins so as not to get taken down by interest groups and the like.
I agree with your opinion by saying that you would probably find a referrance to such a thing as Incest within some guides to the Realms, but it is so sugar coated so that Wizards Of The Coast TM does not get attacked for it's inclusion of the issue.
Meaning it would not be directly detectable.
LSWSjr of LSWSjr Publications, Australia signing off.