I don't want sound too conceited, but I'd be most surprised if one would install any of the said mods over our HLA table... trust me people, we've got true quality here.
He, that's not very polite
Not all will like our tables. E.G., our monks are "less poweful" than Kish's ones, in some aspects.
BTW, about aVENGER's stuff: don't forget to mention that the "revised" versions of Refinements are also enhanced by new icons and
portrait icons
compatibility
sigh...
people, give me a break, I know about this problem.
Things will have to be tried case by case.
First, a new Kit (playable or "invisible") may come with a NEW HLA table, or not.
If it comes with a new table, that one will have its own name, and will reference existing spells or new ones... not ours, for sure.
(UNLESS the naming of the table itself is very unfortunate and clashes with ours: in that case mess could happen, depending on the order of installation).
This is the case of the (magnificent
) Sword Angel kit itself. It has its own table, and no one messes with that.
If the new kit comes
without a table, it would
probably point to one of the default names, ex LUPA0, for paladins. Since we REPLACE this one, it would get
our default Paladin table. In that sense it'd be
compatible again, since it'd use our system. Suboptimal compatibility though, since OUR system would imply specific tables for each kit, not the reutilization of the default ones.
For optimal compatibility we should coordinate with mod authors.
For the tables of in-game kits I've followed the numeration of the CLAB files, for consistency and ordering reasons (I really needed some order when writing that damn tp2).
Off! That's the theory.
Please @Caedwyr, reword the compatibility section at your will