You can almost grasp their love for the game by the way they are handling this project.
Oh come on. How is it that the critical side is criticized for overstating things when no one's raises an eyebrow to statements like this?
The bottom-line is that they released a version of Baldur's Gate which you really have to work for to find any advantages to compared to a
BGT-installation with mods, yet with a number of sizeable disadvantages. I don't care about how lovely a guy Trent is. He could be running a home for orphaned kittens on the side and I wouldn't give a toss. The bottom line is that he is splitting the community around a product that has the sole end goal of making him a profit, and he provides an inferior product. Yes, maybe that product will end up being surperior to modded
BGT with years and years of modder devotion, but that isn't what he gets paid to provide.
He gets paid to provided a
better version of Baldur's Gate to me. He has failed to do that. As far as Overhaul and
BG:
EE goes, that's the only thing they should be judged upon. Not whether they're really good guys or awfully nice on the forums or whatever else they might have going for them. Is
BG:
EE an
enhanced version of the
BGT install I have on my computer? No. Just no. All that additional content and freedom from bugs for a dubious new UI, three NPCs and a very average arena-mode with little ties to the rest of the game? It's absurd. This situation, is absurd.
Edited by Grunker, 04 December 2012 - 07:43 AM.
"I've heard people complain that the game [the new Prince of Persia] is too easy, which seems odd to me, since I died more times than The Nameless One in a smoothie-maker."
- Yahtzee