Imoen Relationship MOD
#21
Posted 29 December 2002 - 07:33 AM
Past: Ascension, Return to Windspear, Imoen Relationship, The Broken Hourglass
"Perfection has no deadline"
#22
Posted 29 December 2002 - 08:35 AM
Do you mean each player will get to write the PC's side of the dialogue? That IS a nice touch.Since the player is the PC, and many players express an interest in Imoen as a romance possibility I would say you are wrong. The only side I am able to shape is Imoen, not the player.
#23
Posted 29 December 2002 - 09:10 AM
Past: Ascension, Return to Windspear, Imoen Relationship, The Broken Hourglass
"Perfection has no deadline"
#24
Posted 29 December 2002 - 09:27 AM
What I should have said is, if you're writing the PC's half of the relationship as well, I find your assertion, that "the player is the PC", to be .... curious.
#25
Posted 29 December 2002 - 02:37 PM
Past: Ascension, Return to Windspear, Imoen Relationship, The Broken Hourglass
"Perfection has no deadline"
#26
Posted 29 December 2002 - 03:27 PM
You seem to want to distance yourself from the PC somehow and that's a different matter than distancing yourself from the players. The PC should be half your story and therefore "yours" in a very real sense.
#27
Posted 29 December 2002 - 04:10 PM
That's what I think anyway
#28
Posted 29 December 2002 - 05:15 PM
#29 -Blucher-
Posted 29 December 2002 - 06:43 PM
Hey, speak for yourself.You couldn't be more right, Quitch. And this is the whole fun, I bet. While biologically not incest, there is a touch of incest to it... She's more than a sister sharing the Taint. Don't tell me people that this is not one of the main reasons you want the romance option. Myself included
I was bummed to find out Imoen was the PCs sister. My aborted Imoen Mod was going to remove that 'fact' entirely (making her a Child of Mask instead) just so I could make an Imoen romance.
I don't think Quitch is planing on any such change, making the the idea of romancing her like, um, kissing your sister. <_<
#30
Posted 30 December 2002 - 01:05 AM
I can understand why many may question the opportunity of a romance, anyway thisWell maybe an evil character might want to give it a try <_<
has to do with habits, education, culture.
But why on earth a PC, raised in Candlekeep with Imoen, without even knowing she was
his (half)sister, has to be EVIL to fall in love with her?
(Evilness/Love is an almost oxymoron, actually....)
Nobody here ever felt something for a girl who happened to be a friend?
Maybe you're speaking about straight sex?
Ever forward, my darling wind...
#31
Posted 14 January 2003 - 01:43 PM
It's more than possible they fell in love with one another at that time. That wouldn't be evil for sure. Trouble begins when you actually get to know of that.I can understand why many may question the opportunity of a romance, anyway this
Well maybe an evil character might want to give it a try
has to do with habits, education, culture.
But why on earth a PC, raised in Candlekeep with Imoen, without even knowing she was
his (half)sister, has to be EVIL to fall in love with her?
(Evilness/Love is an almost oxymoron, actually....)
Nobody here ever felt something for a girl who happened to be a friend?
Maybe you're speaking about straight sex?
Evilness/love - yes, quite right. But some amount of evilness and some amount of love is within every human.
My personal views on the subject are not fixed, my character is not really I in BG2. He has a different background, somewhat different personality he may have and generally his life is more eventful and more morbid than mine. As a paladin he's 100% unlikely to engage in physical if they're biological siblings. But if not... Who knows. Or would anyone be able to kill a true love within himself if it out of the blue turns out the soulmate is a sibling?
Another point is that Gorion had something to say about their upbringing. I suppose he would treat them as siblings if he thought they were. He would realise the love between the two as well and before they do even, being an experienced sage and harper. What about this?
[frater Dormitius 'De illustribus conditoribus ordinis equestris sancti Ganeonis']
#32
Posted 02 February 2003 - 09:51 AM
If it is wrong to sleep with your "sister" in a game, and therefore you should not be able to do so, why can you kill innocent people, and especially children? Isn't that worse?
When Interplay & Black Isle Studios released Fallout 2, the European version was modified so that all the children were removed from the game. In the American version, they were there, and if you killed one, accidentaly or otherwise, you got a childkiller reputation. In the European version, they were removed. Or rather, they were invisible, so you couldn't see them, and you couldn't interact with them or target them with weapons. Too bad you could still kill them with stray explosives...
Anyway, If you want to remove one thing from a game because "it is wrong, gross, unnatural" or whatever, then you might as well make a pink sugary sweet paradise game where the world is a place full of harmony and happy, good and "normal" people, and where nothing bad ever happens.
I'm not saying you MUST have a romance in the Mod because "it COULD happen". But if you decide wether or not to have one, it shouldn't be removed just because some people think it is wrong. I think killing innocents is wrong. Will all innocent bystanders in the Mod be immortal? Probably not.
#33
Posted 02 February 2003 - 06:57 PM
#34
Posted 03 February 2003 - 05:17 AM
#35 -Guest-
Posted 06 April 2003 - 05:37 PM
#36
Posted 07 April 2003 - 12:40 AM
Past: Ascension, Return to Windspear, Imoen Relationship, The Broken Hourglass
"Perfection has no deadline"
#37
Posted 12 June 2003 - 06:52 AM
#38
Posted 12 June 2003 - 07:33 AM
Past: Ascension, Return to Windspear, Imoen Relationship, The Broken Hourglass
"Perfection has no deadline"
#39
Posted 29 July 2003 - 03:44 AM
#40
Posted 06 June 2004 - 10:38 PM
Futurama quotes rock