NWN II in comparison to NWN/BGII?
#1
Posted 07 September 2008 - 10:38 AM
Z
#2
Posted 07 September 2008 - 06:11 PM
As for the actual storyline, it's on par with BG2, or a little better. If I had to award points, I'd give BG1 9/10, NWN2 8/10, BG2 7/10, and ToB 3/10.
The combat in NWN2 is pretty lame, and that's saying something. My idea of combat is surrounding the bad-guy with a lot of metal an pounding on him. Tactics? Spell use? Bah. Well, OK, I did leave Qara, Sand and Elanee to their own devices, when it came to spells, but they did just fine without me. I use no tactical or AI enhancing mods. I think I had to reload once in three run-throughs. Plus, everybody just gets back up after the last enemy is dead, with charming little "groan..." barkstrings over their heads throughout combat, by the way, so there isn't really any danger in letting somebody snuff it.
I couldn't bear to play NWN1. Maybe I'll try again sometime, but it was realy That Bad, IMO.
"Imagination is given to man to console him for what he is not; a sense of humor, for what he is." - Oscar Wilde
berelinde's mods
TolkienAcrossTheWater website
TolkienAcrossTheWater Forum
#3
Posted 07 September 2008 - 08:12 PM
I Ride for the King!
a.k.a. Chev
#4 --Majes--
Posted 07 September 2008 - 09:30 PM
I agree that NWN2 romances sucked - Romantic Encounters had deeper relationships and interaction! But the Bishop romance by Domi is excellent (on par with the BG2 ones), and I'm really looking forward to the Casavir expansion and the flirt packs for the other romanceables, as well as Neeshka getting her "wall scene."
In general, I think many of the comanion NPC's got shorted for content as well.
I also disliked the combat; if I have to hack through too many hordes of enemies just powerful enough to be annoying, I get bored and cheat. Yes, I admit it.
#5
Posted 07 September 2008 - 10:13 PM
As for the actual storyline, it's on par with BG2, or a little better. If I had to award points, I'd give BG1 9/10, NWN2 8/10, BG2 7/10, and ToB 3/10.
I couldn't bear to play NWN1. Maybe I'll try again sometime, but it was realy That Bad, IMO.
Hmmm, interesting. I think that the worst part in NWN1 was running the erands for ton of a people because the lame excuse of story it had. What I liked in BG1/2 (and PST) was that the story was about saving your self, not some idiot nobles who don't appreciate your effort anyway *grumble* I guess I'm not altruistic enough to save the world. While playing NWN1 I was practically forcing my self, I just wanted to see how it ends. And that's why I'm afraid to play NWN2 too. What I did like though was NWN1:Hordes of the Underdark. It had a nice story, a good romance, hells, and it's about saving your own hide. Saving the world is just an extra bonus
#6
Posted 07 September 2008 - 10:25 PM
- Liam
Modding Projects
Complete:
Arath NPC - Nephele NPC - Xulaye NPC - Iylos NPC - Ninde NPC - Darian NPC - Yeslick NPC - Adrian NPC - Dace NPC - Valerie NPC - Isra NPC
Viconia Friendship - Mazzy Friendship - Imoen Friendship - Yoshimo Friendship - Sarevok Friendship - Neera Expansion
IEP Extended Banter
Sarevok Romance
Haer'Dalis Romance
In Progress:
Khadion NPC - Delainy NPC - Sarine NPC
#7
Posted 08 September 2008 - 01:54 AM
Split into a new thread.
Thanks
#8
Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:44 AM
#9
Posted 08 September 2008 - 06:09 AM
The combat is incredibly dull, unlike BG2. The characters are all 1 dimensional sterotypes with nary a single origianl concept between them. The voice acting is mediocre to awful (Oh God, Neeshka). The loading times are horrible, and it takes up far too much harddrive space for the graphics to justify. And the camera angles are Satan's home videos.
MotB on the other hand, is awesome and is worth slugging through the awful combat for. The characters are my favourites in any game bar The Longest Journey/ Dreamfall.
Longing for the old pen and paper modules of the 70?s and 80?s. Experience AD&D?s greatest adventures using the infinity engine: Classic Adventures Visit our homepage at Classic Adventures Homepage
#10
Posted 08 September 2008 - 07:24 AM
With MotB, I'm just not really wild about anyone. OK, I like Okku's grumpiness and Gann's cocky insecurity, and Safiya is all right, as far as it goes, but little between-the-action scenes don't play in my head with MotB companions like they do with the OC ones. Heck, I've written 18 chapters of a fanfic, and most of it covers the interval between meeting Casavir and setting out to save Shandra the first time. With the MotB companions, I spend all my time wondering "Why is there no Khegar?" and thinking "I miss my paladin."
"Imagination is given to man to console him for what he is not; a sense of humor, for what he is." - Oscar Wilde
berelinde's mods
TolkienAcrossTheWater website
TolkienAcrossTheWater Forum
#11
Posted 08 September 2008 - 09:30 AM
To be fair, I read fanfiction, and some of the stuff out there is really wonderful - the relationships and characteristics may not be mine, but I absorb and expand upon them when I'm running my game through. It helps me to imagine, and that's a big part of playing through a game, for me.
To echo everyone else, the combat was easy. Like berelinde, I've never been good at anything like that. It's not why I play, and to be honest, I'd much rather prefer an interactive story than a proper challenge. I sailed through the game without any reloads, which for me was fine, but for a lot of others sucks. I thought the (attempt at) using the skills you invest in for dialogue was a really nice touch, and I found myself wishing BG had a similar system, where maybe more/less intelligent characters had different responses. NWN had this, also, but the way cut-scenes are done in NWN2 really helped me to enjoy that feature more.
And Zyrica, don't be confused by Lysan. He likes Baldur's Gate, but he doesn't really like the plot.
#12
Posted 08 September 2008 - 09:43 AM
where maybe more/less intelligent characters had different responses.
BG2 has this actually. try playing th game as someone with low Int/ Wis/ Cha and then as someone with high scores.
You might like The Longest Journey, Crazee, and its sequel Dreamfall. Interactive, little to no combat, full of story and characters. Or Planescape: Torment if you've not played it already.
Longing for the old pen and paper modules of the 70?s and 80?s. Experience AD&D?s greatest adventures using the infinity engine: Classic Adventures Visit our homepage at Classic Adventures Homepage
#13 --Zyrica--
Posted 08 September 2008 - 10:11 AM
I'm also so a sucker for a romance and there really isn't any good ones in NWN. I can't really remember what was the guys name you can have romance but it was the lamest romance ever! First it takes ages to court and finally when you get the guy admit that he "cares for you more then a friend" and that's it!
BG2's romance with Anomen on the contrary was very good. It had the best dialogue, although at first Anomen really drived me crazy. You get the feeling that he's one idiot noble who knows nothing about anything and thinks he's better than everyone else.
Oh well look at my rantings...
My point is that while NWN was overall enjoyable (especially with the mods) BG2 hooked me like a drug (and PST almost ruined my relationship with my boyfriend )
All I have to do now is to decide should I take my chances with NWN2...
Z
#14
Posted 08 September 2008 - 11:01 AM
"Imagination is given to man to console him for what he is not; a sense of humor, for what he is." - Oscar Wilde
berelinde's mods
TolkienAcrossTheWater website
TolkienAcrossTheWater Forum
#15
Posted 08 September 2008 - 03:38 PM
Anyway, to the point, I don't think NWN2 is better than BG2 in any aspects. BG2 is just far more superior than NWN2 (and in my opinion, any other RPGs! It's the ultimate, the best RPG!)
@berelinde: For some strange reason, I quite liked Bishop! Which is really strange because I'm usually Pally lover. I love Anomen to bits, and I really respect Keldorn! But for some reason, I really, really dislike Casavir! I really can't stand him. Hopefully your mod will make me change my opinion of Casavir
@Zyrica: BG2 is like a drug for me too. After all these years, I'm still playing BG2! It's like my... 70th replay? XD I've never got into PS:T though. You might like MotB if you really enjoyed PS:T. They are quite similar games in many ways (which is why I think I disliked both games).
Edited by princesspurpleblob, 08 September 2008 - 03:58 PM.
#16
Posted 09 September 2008 - 04:48 AM
Longing for the old pen and paper modules of the 70?s and 80?s. Experience AD&D?s greatest adventures using the infinity engine: Classic Adventures Visit our homepage at Classic Adventures Homepage
#17
Posted 09 September 2008 - 02:13 PM
No one seemed to comment on this. So as spoiler free as I can say it, both NWN2 and MotB focus heavily on saving yourself, with the former having you help save the world as a side bonus.Hmmm, interesting. I think that the worst part in NWN1 was running the erands for ton of a people because the lame excuse of story it had. What I liked in BG1/2 (and PST) was that the story was about saving your self, not some idiot nobles who don't appreciate your effort anyway *grumble* I guess I'm not altruistic enough to save the world. While playing NWN1 I was practically forcing my self, I just wanted to see how it ends. And that's why I'm afraid to play NWN2 too. What I did like though was NWN1:Hordes of the Underdark. It had a nice story, a good romance, hells, and it's about saving your own hide. Saving the world is just an extra bonus
I'd probably say that the storyline of MotB is pretty compelling and interesting. I could say the same about NWN2 but I haven't made it past the beginning guard quests in Neverwinter because I didn't know I was supposed to be Lawful Good*. Bah!
There are two paths for you in NWN2 really. LG and CE. Do not make a CG character. It just goes over bad.
"She was a fire, and I had no doubt that she had already done her share of burning." - Lord Firael Algathrin
"Most assume that all the followers of Lathander are great morning people. They're very wrong." - Tanek of Cloakwood
we are all adults playing a fantasy together, - cmorgan
#18 --Majes--
Posted 12 September 2008 - 09:59 AM
MotB made me mad because they did away with practiacally everything from the OC (I had actually become attached to some of those stereotypical characters, dang it!). However, I ended up enjoying it and really loving Kaelyn the Dove, so for a while there, I was having fun with it. I didn't mind the spirit hunger, and liked the effect it had on my character (except for the silly alignment points). Weird, I know . . .
Then the ending (all of Act III, really) completely sucked. There wasn't a ton of roleplay, you couldn't choose to go off with Kaelyn to oppose the Wall (which I hate the concept of, I really do), and you couldn't even have a dialogue with Akachi. Total letdown.
#19
Posted 12 September 2008 - 10:24 AM
"Imagination is given to man to console him for what he is not; a sense of humor, for what he is." - Oscar Wilde
berelinde's mods
TolkienAcrossTheWater website
TolkienAcrossTheWater Forum
#20
Posted 12 September 2008 - 10:28 AM
I didn't like the romances in OC. Casavir appealed to me more like a friend/mentor and Bishop scared the lights out of me. It was all juts one big 'NO' all around.
For me BG2 and MotB are on the same level.