A... very sensitiveishish hypotheticat question :D
#81
Posted 25 December 2002 - 10:11 PM
I mean if we are going to continue this debate here, at least we should relate it to the Protagonist and Imoen's relationship.
LSWSjr of LSWSjr Publications OZ Mark 2, in Australia signing off
In the end, when the chips are down, when you feel like its all over, you have to ask yourself "Was this the right way to be defeated by the inevitable?" and there is only one answer... "It is in this liftime, so I'll see ya in the next, Rowan T. of LSWSjr Publications signing off!"
*Rowan Tritton of LSWSjr Publications/Productions/Studios Australia.
#82
Posted 26 February 2003 - 09:52 PM
1. A car accident is on a completely different page then rape find a better example. The woman is the primary victim not an unwilling spectator to a hit and run and a mother looses alot more than a passerby even if they do give up the child.You witness a car accident, the guilty one flees. Nobody else's around, the victim lays
on the street.
Sure, the accident wasn't caused by you, but still you're supposed to help the victim,
call for medics, wait there and do what you can to help the injured.
It is stated, to be clearer, that the value of a life weighs higher than your time, your work
and all the duties you have to lose standing there, even if you are not guilty.
Extending the concept (which doesn't come from me in the first place), pregnant girls, even
if unwilling, should be considered like the keepers of the new life, the only persons who
can help the being 'till the time comes when somebody else can take care of it.
Of course, they should even be supported in all the possible ways by the rest of the society.
2. Some women are so tramatized by the rape that they would see the pregnancy a more of an STD than a new life.
3. A rape victim may be ashamed and not wish to come forward and a confidential abortion is a good way to pretend nothing has happend and try and continue her life.
4. Society is cruel. You can't expect society to provide for everyone. It does enough to make it's constituents feel better about themselfs and forgets the rest. (Don't take this as a cue for a nother topic of debate )
#83
Posted 26 February 2003 - 09:56 PM
Who is qualified to make that ussumption?I'm going to be honest here. I would have far MORE guilt on my soul about that than I would about aborting a 2 week old ball of cells. And at 2 weeks, it is little more than that.
#84
Posted 28 February 2003 - 03:23 AM
I would love for you to bury this young one with words learned from the experience of an older life such as yourself.
I ask this only because Quitch seems not to attack when you combat others, while in my case I feel he expects more from me?!? Although don't quote me on it.
LSWSjr of LSWSjr Productions Australia, wishing Littiz on future victories and signing off
In the end, when the chips are down, when you feel like its all over, you have to ask yourself "Was this the right way to be defeated by the inevitable?" and there is only one answer... "It is in this liftime, so I'll see ya in the next, Rowan T. of LSWSjr Publications signing off!"
*Rowan Tritton of LSWSjr Publications/Productions/Studios Australia.
#85
Posted 28 February 2003 - 04:01 PM
You make it all worth while
#86 -Cybersquirt-
Posted 28 February 2003 - 10:50 PM
You must be joking.Littiz, could you please disable this Unvoiced Anarchy with a quick cut from your wit and wisdom, he is starting to prove a greater problem than we may have originally thought.
I would love for you to bury this young one with words learned from the experience of an older life such as yourself.
#87
Posted 01 March 2003 - 12:44 AM
Anyone with the ability to express their opinion, rrrrWho is qualified to make that ussumption?I'm going to be honest here. I would have far MORE guilt on my soul about that than I would about aborting a 2 week old ball of cells. And at 2 weeks, it is little more than that.
#88
Posted 01 March 2003 - 10:55 AM
Yeah that is an opinion but how can you be sure.Anyone with the ability to express their opinion, rrrr
I was not trying to make anyone (other than littiz ) look stupid.
I was just trying to express a point.
When does a fetus become a human being?
To assume that point in developement is to play god.
#89
Posted 01 March 2003 - 01:29 PM
No, it's to assume a point in developmentTo assume that point in developement is to play god.
I don't believe in God, not everyone does
#90
Posted 02 March 2003 - 02:22 AM
Now Cybersquirt...You must be joking.Littiz, could you please disable this Unvoiced Anarchy with a quick cut from your wit and wisdom, he is starting to prove a greater problem than we may have originally thought.
I would love for you to bury this young one with words learned from the experience of an older life such as yourself.
While it is true that I usually say much in jest, I don't mind motivating others with ego massage, so that they might carry out a task I cannot. Especially if it is a friend such as Littiz... B)
Furthermore when given the choice to side either with a debating opponent I consider a friend, or one I don't consider as such, I choose the friend/rival rather than the rival.
LSWSjr of LSWSjr Productions Australia, signing off
In the end, when the chips are down, when you feel like its all over, you have to ask yourself "Was this the right way to be defeated by the inevitable?" and there is only one answer... "It is in this liftime, so I'll see ya in the next, Rowan T. of LSWSjr Publications signing off!"
*Rowan Tritton of LSWSjr Publications/Productions/Studios Australia.
#91
Posted 02 March 2003 - 11:12 AM
Yet to have the power over the life or death of a being, no matter how minute or unclasified in terms of humanity that life is, you play god . Whether you beleive in god or not isn't a requiremet.No, it's to assume a point in developmentTo assume that point in developement is to play god.
I don't believe in God, not everyone does
Human life is there.
You might say it only has potential for human life yet it does live and can be calssified as human as it does grow into a child.
Haveing the choice to decide whether a human life lives or dies is playing god.
#92
Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:03 PM
Otherwise, what am I playing? A... G-o-d? What is that?
You assume that a fetus is already human, are you playing a G-o-d?
#93
Posted 02 March 2003 - 11:34 PM
By that logic, stepping on ants is playing god. You are having power over the life or death of a minute being not classified as human...though with an intellectual capacity certainly greater than that of a two-week old fetus.Yet to have the power over the life or death of a being, no matter how minute or unclasified in terms of humanity that life is, you play god .
http://www.moveon.org/fox/
"You are what you do. Choose again, and change."
--Cordelia Naismith Vorkosigan
#94 -Cybersquirt-
Posted 03 March 2003 - 12:47 AM
"a 2 week old bundle of cells" is a human life?Yet to have the power over the life or death of a being, no matter how minute or unclasified in terms of humanity that life is, you play god . Whether you beleive in god or not isn't a requiremet.No, it's to assume a point in developmentTo assume that point in developement is to play god.
I don't believe in God, not everyone does
Human life is there.
You might say it only has potential for human life yet it does live and can be calssified as human as it does grow into a child.
Haveing the choice to decide whether a human life lives or dies is playing god.
Not one that I want.
Someone, somewhere is in a coma. brain-dead, but technically that's a human life too. Parents or spouse have control over that one, don't they?
But that's what the question comes down to. What constitutes life or a life? That bundle of cells does not always become a "human being", it has been known to self-abort; it does not meet the criteria for my definition of a "human life".
Then there's the effect that "bundle of cells" will have on MY life when & if it actually does mature into a fetus. Why does that not give me the right to decide whether or not I'm 'up to the task'? The "god" I believe in gave me a brain & free will.
#95
Posted 03 March 2003 - 04:40 AM
The simple existance of this debate proves that life has a relative value.
Everyone has different opinions.
My point was simply: given the fact that (mostly) people state that life is the absolute value,
then they should have the guts to remain coherent with their words.
As I am capable to do.
*If* human life is the most precious thing, everything else is secondary by definition.
With the exception of another human life.
Either that, or they should be clear from the start:
"Life is expendable relatively to the context".
No need for me to use cool words about values, and then find all the necessary exceptions when need arises.
About defining when a human life starts, really, people try for their convenience to complicate the easiest of the matters.
Human life starts from its beginning.
About my ego.. I was out to play with my band these days, had fun, signed a couple of autographs,
and answered to people who wanted to know "where the hell did you learn to play that way?!?".
This to immodestly say that I don't need to satisfy my ego "beating" someone in this forum.
About proving my stupidity, I suggest you wait at least for my intelligence to fade away...B)
@LSWSjr:
I (think I) appreciate your words, BTW, I don't feel like anyone's rival.
I'm ready to peace as much as I am to war, you can testify, and my last message to Cybersquirt,
which got no replies, can testify as well.
Oh, I'm 26 and a half, anyway
End.
I won't post anymore about things unrelated to BG2.
Ever forward, my darling wind...
#96 -Cybersquirt-
Posted 03 March 2003 - 12:20 PM
#97
Posted 04 March 2003 - 01:40 AM
Please note that as long as you know what big words mean, it is alright to use them and let that be a message to all.
On an Imoen Relationship Module note: I think the choice should be left open to the Protagonist and Imoen, rather than taking on side or the other, or merely have them use some form of magical contraception in the first place.
LSWSjr of LSWSjr Productions Australia, signing off
In the end, when the chips are down, when you feel like its all over, you have to ask yourself "Was this the right way to be defeated by the inevitable?" and there is only one answer... "It is in this liftime, so I'll see ya in the next, Rowan T. of LSWSjr Publications signing off!"
*Rowan Tritton of LSWSjr Publications/Productions/Studios Australia.
#98
Posted 04 March 2003 - 04:20 PM
On an Imoen Relationship Module note: I think the choice should be left open to the Protagonist and Imoen
Since I intend to allow the player to do pretty much as they wish, any debate on the point should focus on whether Imoen would ever consider a proposal/advance from her sibling.
There won't be any glass ceiling marked "Moral limit". Tear out her throat for all I care.
Past: Ascension, Return to Windspear, Imoen Relationship, The Broken Hourglass
"Perfection has no deadline"
#99
Posted 11 March 2003 - 03:15 PM
I'm more or less of the opinion that the PC and Imoen can do whatever they want.
#100
Posted 13 March 2003 - 04:59 PM
Male Protagonist:
"Imoen, have you ever considered maybe starting a family one day?"
w/, w/o Imoen interaction at this point.
"It is a thought that has crossed my mind for some time and has arisen once more, due to the current circumstances of our relationship with each other."
Female Protagonist:
"Imoen, would you have it, if we would be able to share a child (by magic or adoption) with each other and in turn build on our family in that sense?"
LSWSjr of LSWSjr Productions Australia, signing off.
In the end, when the chips are down, when you feel like its all over, you have to ask yourself "Was this the right way to be defeated by the inevitable?" and there is only one answer... "It is in this liftime, so I'll see ya in the next, Rowan T. of LSWSjr Publications signing off!"
*Rowan Tritton of LSWSjr Publications/Productions/Studios Australia.