As we know, there is no doubt that we have severe differences in the principle of how to administrate a virtual forum, SConrad.
According to my count, you've violated at least three of the points of the BWL ToU
This is news. Does BWL ToU apply to
SHS forums as well...?
and two of the SHS guidelines in this thread alone.
I'm sorry to hear that. You didn't inform me in PM which ones these are. If you do, I'll do my best to respect them next time.
(About my policy at BWL in these cases: When someone ignores a part of the ToU at BWL, I always inform him/her on PM. I think that both for the user and the forum, the best is if the user is told which guidelines were ignored by him/her, so he will not fall into the same mistake again. This is both the forum's and the user's interest.)
I would like to add, however, that you have spoken about BWL ToU much more than other people altogether, ever. You even seem to be following how
I respect
the BWL ToU on
SHS forums... Wouldn't it be better if you just accepted how BWL's ToU is enforced, and how BWL is being administrated?
Except you and maybe two others, no one ever had any problem with BWL's administration. Several people expressed their disagreement regarding certain BWL rules (they're strict, they're not user-friendly), but accepted it, and our active forum members find the forum a useful and flourishing place. (One might say: "yes but if you changed this and that in your ToU, many more people would register!". Yes, maybe. But this is not our goal. BWL's goal differs from that.).
Please don't compare the prefix reservations list with WeiDU, since the latter is immensely more fundamental to the modding community compared to the prefix list. If two prefixes was listed as a 'Global Conflict' or even deleted from the list, I doubt that would have any impact on anything. Banning mods from WeiDU, however, is a complete other matter.
As I mentioned it originally, I compared them from one aspect, i.e. responsibility. Maintaining both of them, even if they aren't equally important (
WeiDU is indeed a more fundemental thing), means responsibility. Some level of responsibility for the maintainer.
Not that I think that is a good idea in any way, I just don't think it's comparable to the prefix reservations list.
Usually, different things can be compared as well, from given aspect. As I said, my aspect was responsibility, and not their content or significance. (Since I've noticed that simple examples to clarify a problem are more effective on forums, here's an example for those who want one: "My car is faster than your dog." -- obviously a silly comparison aspect. However, "my car has the same colour as your dog's collar". is OK. I couldn't find a more apt example for the latter one, but this also reflects the point.)
I've told you countless times that I don't really have any control over the contents of those centres - I could, of course, but I don't want to. Sir Kalthorine is currently in Kuwait, and had to leave very suddenly - which explains his absence lately. Have you not considered that this might be the reason you never received an answer?
I didn't blame SirKalt for anything. Neither you, but you were talking about neutrality, that is why I brought it up to you. As I said, I actually don't care so much if the text is there or not.
The fact that you are more likely to find SHS mods on the IEGMC than DHDC might have something to do with it, too. I'm just guessing, though.
Yes it's true. But then your statement about neutrality isn't true, obviously. Neutrality means that all sides are treated equally, regardless which one we have better relationship with (or regardless which side we are affiliated with), for example.
As for the eternal DHDC/IEGMC-debate, all I can say is that I think that the reason DHDC isn't treated equally is because the IEGMC is such a well-known and well-established download centre throughout the community.
(1) DHDC is also a well-known and well-estabilished download centre, only certain people don't want to realise and accept it. (TheWizard. From the point DHDC started, he is constantly trying to use every opportunity to cause harm to DHDC in any way, because he couldn't and can't accept the fact that his IEGMC isn't in "monopoly" any more. Envy is eating him all the time, basically. For those who find these information new, I recommend checking one of my previous posts where I "reply" to TheWizard's post.)
I've never said IEGMC is better/worse than DHDC, or that DHDC is better than IEGMC etc. (Certain people, mainly TheWizard, tried to use this /useless and false/ argument as well when attacking DHDC. ). In fact, I never compared them. I think both are useful for players, some players prefer TheWiz's site, others prefer Dragonshoard. And when I say "DHDC is good", I'm just frank. We have right to say "my house is beautiful", don't we? I see no harm in that. I've never said "DHDC is better than x and y", after all.
You wouldn't believe a freshly started community immediately would receive the attention SHS, PPG or G3 do?
(2) Again, it does receive as much general attention as any of those sites. Yes, it hasn't got as many registered users/daily posts/number of mods. And? These would be a naive aspects to examine anything. We work on bigger projects (mainly), this is why we have less mods, and thus less visitors, for example.
It seems that you're comparing things in a respect which isn't really a good base of comparison. How do you measure 'attention'? For example, Avenger_TBG's comment might mean more appreciation to BWL than the "I luv yer mod!" remark of 100 players.
Still my hope is in BWL mods, as they actually try to take over bigger projects or try to explore the less known parts of the engine (like new animations, new gui, etc), unlike others.
I do not want to try to decide which site receives more attention, because the question of "From what viewpoint do we examine the 'attention'?" would prevent me from getting an answer.
(By the way, BWL /2004 summer/ isn't a freshly started community, at least in my interpretation. Yes, the other ones mentioned were started earlier, indeed. )
How will the community work together if we measure 'attention'? I think that
SHS, CoM,
G3,
PPG, BWL, ... (not a complete list; I apologise to those who I didn't mention), all.. all of them are same important. Since mod and group traditions, individual relationships, different policy of forum administration etc. divides the entire 'community' of modders, ONE big community is just a naive ideal (one forum, shared resources etc.), BUT cooperation is very important. in fact, maybe the various differences between the aforementioned communities (
SHS, CoM,
G3,
PPG, CoM, BWL,...) are what makes the modding nice from community aspect. We cooperate, yet we're different. (Like the principle of European Union: uniformism in economy /and other things/, while reserving the cultural differences. Perhaps this analogy is too brave, but I think it clarifies my point in some level.)
To sum up, I don't see why we should measure 'attention' or 'well-estabilishment'. As I said, the reason I brought up the DHDC/iegmc disproportion in the size of text, is that you had talked about the new
SHS, its neutrality etc.
To sum up, I don't think it would do any good to the modding community if we argue about how we follow
our own forum's Terms of Use on
other forums, how much attention do the various sites ('communities') get, how long has a site been estabilished etc.
Edited by Baronius, 12 April 2006 - 08:27 AM.